This made me laugh when I saw it on the Free Press web site:Ooo. Ooo. I know! Ask me!
Katz runs the city of Winnipeg like I play monopoly (except that Katz doesn't end up in jail).
In the column Lett makes a good point about the costs of developing Point Douglas:
All the moaning and whining about the costs of assembling and remediating the light industrial lands that dominate South Point Douglas ignores an important point: The city will have to bear those costs sometime in the future if Point Douglas is to move forward.That does not mean that the stadium/hotel/waterpark idea is any better of an option for development in the area. What this means is that our mayor and our perma-councilors need to do some thinking and planning about how to revitalize the neighbourhood over the long term. And I'm not talking about fancy street lamps, planters and banners that say "South Point Douglas Village". I'm talking about cleaning up the area and encouraging organic growth. And listening to the people who know something about urban planning.
I'll trade you my Higgins Ave and my Upper Fort Garry for your Forks.

